🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.